Comments on: col's blog search terms: 3/17/08 http://colsblog.com/2008/03/18/cols-blog-search-terms-31708/ Thu, 26 Jan 2012 17:26:53 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1 By: nwo http://colsblog.com/2008/03/18/cols-blog-search-terms-31708/comment-page-1/#comment-1370 nwo Tue, 18 Mar 2008 13:29:16 +0000 http://colsblog.com/2008/03/18/cols-blog-search-terms-31708/#comment-1370 Did 80% of your hits come from 20% of the search words? I think that you have a more upscale readership than I do. Did 80% of your hits come from 20% of the search words?

I think that you have a more upscale readership than I do.

]]> By: colio2007 http://colsblog.com/2008/03/18/cols-blog-search-terms-31708/comment-page-1/#comment-1372 colio2007 Tue, 18 Mar 2008 02:37:29 +0000 http://colsblog.com/2008/03/18/cols-blog-search-terms-31708/#comment-1372 stupid researchers indeed! daniel craig, andy baldwin, luke wilson. blondies = hotties! stupid researchers indeed! daniel craig, andy baldwin, luke wilson. blondies = hotties!

]]> By: John in IL http://colsblog.com/2008/03/18/cols-blog-search-terms-31708/comment-page-1/#comment-1371 John in IL Tue, 18 Mar 2008 02:02:26 +0000 http://colsblog.com/2008/03/18/cols-blog-search-terms-31708/#comment-1371 It wasn't me, I swear. Speaking of, what do think about <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk:80/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2008/03/17/nskin117.xml" rel="nofollow">this</a>? Stupid researchers. It wasn’t me, I swear.

Speaking of, what do think about this? Stupid researchers.

]]>